Logo degrowth

Blog

Defending Hambach Forest is part of the struggle for degrowth!

By: Kai Kuhnhenn & Nina Treu

10.09.2018

Degrowth stands for moving beyond the paradigm of the growth- and profit-oriented economic system. By means of a social-ecological transformation, a good life for all can be achieved. This means overcoming the imperial way of living of the global North, building alternatives, and creating positive narratives of our possible future. This also includes resisting useless large-scale projects, privatizations, and destructive enterprises - in short, against the part of the economy that is supposed to shrink because its negative effects on the environment and society are out of proportion to its benefits.

The lignite industry is a prime example of this part of the economy

- Lignite-fired power generation supplies about a quarter of the electricity used in Germany, but produces half of the greenhouse gas emissions from electricity supply, - for the mining of lignite, landscapes and villages are irreparably destroyed, people are forcibly expropriated and resettled, - without the electricity from lignite-fired power stations, the lights do not go out, but German electricity exports decline and electricity from other power stations, which are all preferable to coal, becomes proportionately higher. There is not one single action of resistance against economic growth, but many struggles fought by many different people, groups and social movements. People from the degrowth movement can, and should, get involved in these struggles.

The fight for the Hambach Forest is particularly worthy of support for three reasons

1. In contrast to many other struggles, the fight against lignite can indeed be won in the foreseeable future – the civil disobedience of the recent years has put pressure on the government, which has set up a committee with a coal commission to discuss the future of the lignite regions. At the same time, RWE's (the power company) approach shows that it has no intention of leaving "its" lignite in the ground. The composition of the coal commission also suggests the conclusion that an imminent end to lignite is, by no means, certain. Against this background, the battle for the Hambach forest is becoming one of the most important social and environmental battlefields of these days. 2. It is not just a question of preserving a particularly valuable piece of forest! It is about the question of what we allow to happen for a bit of cheap electricity, economic growth, and who makes the decisions. Is it the companies, which, based on a mining law from the Nazi era, can assert their interests? Is it the state which overrides fundamental rights by turning the forest into a 'danger area'? Or is it civil society which resists where injustice is being justified? 3. A connection with the climate justice movement is particularly obvious for degrowth, because both movements bring ecological and social aims together - instead of pitching them against each other. The fact that this works well is shown by the many years of cooperation between climate camps and Degrowth Summer Schools. Here the demand for an end to lignite mining is combined with the demand for long-term structural change, so that the workers*, the people, and their region do not become the victims. With the preservation of the Hambach forest neither the fight against economic growth nor against the mining of lignite will be won. While the attention is on the Hambach forest, the village of Keyenberg is being resettled (petition against it can be found here) and the village of Pödelwitz is being threatened with future mining (petition against here). But it would be an important victory and a symbol against lignite and climate change, erosion of democracy, civil rights, and against growth as the sole political goal. Therefore: support the resistance in the Hambach forest! Find out more here. Go to the forest, support actions in your city, share the information with others, bring attention to the larger issues at play.

# Hambi bleibt! Hambi stays!

 

About the author

Kai Kuhnhenn & Nina Treu

More from this author

Share on the corporate technosphere


Our republication policy

Support us

Blog

A dangerous courtship: The authoritarian nationalist right and the post-growth debate

2295986167 6f6dc2d0db o

By: Dennis Eversberg

Growth-critical authors and advocates of a post-growth society are often criticized on the grounds that some of their arguments appear open to appropriation by authoritarian nationalist and nativist racist forces. As such objections are often made in a polemical and overly generalised manner, often ultimately aiming to delegitimize growth-critical ideas as a whole, those being criticised often ...

Blog

Paths towards a Postgrowth-Economy – the four-in-one-perspective

Vortrag zeitwohlstand prof frigga haug

By Frigga Haug At the closing event of the attac-congress on capitalism in 2009, the German politician Heiner Geissler pleaded for an eco-dictatorship. After all, even as a prominent member of the Christian Democratic Party he had joined attac out of concern over problems of capitalist society, among them the ecological one - and was now calling on the 2000 or so participants to take action to...

Blog

The good news: No capitalism without growth

By Friederike Habermann Growth is no option, considering that an absolute decoupling of growth and resource use has historically proven impossible – This position unites everybody who contributes to the Degrowth-conference. In the media too there is an increasing presence of growth critique. Even the German liberal weekly newspaper “Die Zeit” (No. 10/2013) ends an editorial on this topic sayin...