Should arguments for degrowth be anthropocentric or ecocentric? And what does this mean in practice? There is an interesting discussion going on, starting with two recent court rulings in New Zealand and India about rivers being granted personal rights. We present an article by Ashish Kothari, Mari Margil and Shrishtee Bajpai, first published for The Guardian. Several geographically-distant but related events signalled a dramatic mind shift in humanity’s troubled relationship with nature last month. First, the New Zealand parliament passed the Te Awa Tupua Act, giving the Whanganui River and ecosystem a legal standing in its own right, guaranteeing its “health and well-being”. Shortly after, a court in India ruled that the Ganges and Yamuna rivers and their related ecosystems have “the status of a legal person, with all corresponding rights, duties and liabilities ... in order to preserve and conserve them”. The history of the rivers makes these proclamations remarkable. The Ganges has long been considered sacred and millions of people depend on it for sustenance, yet it has been polluted, mined, diverted and degraded to a shocking extent. The Whanganui has witnessed a century-old struggle between the indigenous Iwi people and the New Zealand government over its treatment. Notably, the Iwi consider themselves and the Whanganui as an indivisible whole, expressed in the common saying: “I am the river, and the river is me.” Rivers are the arteries of the earth, and lifelines for humanity and millions of other animals and plants. It’s no wonder they have been venerated, considered as ancestors or mothers, and held up as sacred symbols. But we have also desecrated them in every conceivable way. Can giving them the legal rights of a human help resolve this awful contradiction? Perhaps, if we are able to think beyond the material limits of how we relate to nature, we can encourage political and economic measures to create a deeper and more ethical relationship. New Zealand and India have recognised the intrinsic rights of rivers, beyond their use for humans. Both recognise rivers as having spiritual, physical and metaphysical characteristics. These crucial extensions of law are based on ethical principles rarely recognised since the industrial age, but this is how indigenous peoples have long treated nature.
Sollte am 25. Mai beim Volksentscheid die Mehrheit der Berliner gegen Neubau auf dem Tempelhofer Feld stimmen, dann wäre das ein Sieg für das Postwachstum. Der Begriff wird bezüglich des Bauens beim Wort genommen, denn das bisherige Wachstum zeigt sich bei unablässig neu wachsenden Bürotürmen, Shopping-Centern und Wohnsiedlungen. Es liegt wohl auch am weit verbreiteten [...]
Barbara Muraca und Tanja von Egan-Krieger sprechen in diesem Interview über “Gutes Leben jenseits des Wachstums – Entwürfe und Kritik feministischer Ökonomik”. Im vierten Teil dieses Interviews geht es um reale Alltagserfahrungen in Griechenland und Deutschland. Es steht die Frage im Mittelpunkt, was unter Arbeit verstanden wird und wie diese verteilt werden sollte. Auf der Tagung [...]
Martin Lindner ist Professor für Didaktik der Biologie und Geographie und war Mitorganisator des Buen Vivir-Symposiums an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. In seinem Interview im Rahmen des Stream towards Degrowth zeigt er einige Alternativen zur Wachstumsgesellschaft auf. Stellen Sie sich vor, die Welt erlebt eine Zeit des „guten Lebens“ jenseits des Wachstums. Blicken wir dann, sagen wir [...]