Should arguments for degrowth be anthropocentric or ecocentric? And what does this mean in practice? There is an interesting discussion going on, starting with two recent court rulings in New Zealand and India about rivers being granted personal rights. We present an article by Ashish Kothari, Mari Margil and Shrishtee Bajpai, first published for The Guardian. Several geographically-distant but related events signalled a dramatic mind shift in humanity’s troubled relationship with nature last month. First, the New Zealand parliament passed the Te Awa Tupua Act, giving the Whanganui River and ecosystem a legal standing in its own right, guaranteeing its “health and well-being”. Shortly after, a court in India ruled that the Ganges and Yamuna rivers and their related ecosystems have “the status of a legal person, with all corresponding rights, duties and liabilities ... in order to preserve and conserve them”. The history of the rivers makes these proclamations remarkable. The Ganges has long been considered sacred and millions of people depend on it for sustenance, yet it has been polluted, mined, diverted and degraded to a shocking extent. The Whanganui has witnessed a century-old struggle between the indigenous Iwi people and the New Zealand government over its treatment. Notably, the Iwi consider themselves and the Whanganui as an indivisible whole, expressed in the common saying: “I am the river, and the river is me.” Rivers are the arteries of the earth, and lifelines for humanity and millions of other animals and plants. It’s no wonder they have been venerated, considered as ancestors or mothers, and held up as sacred symbols. But we have also desecrated them in every conceivable way. Can giving them the legal rights of a human help resolve this awful contradiction? Perhaps, if we are able to think beyond the material limits of how we relate to nature, we can encourage political and economic measures to create a deeper and more ethical relationship. New Zealand and India have recognised the intrinsic rights of rivers, beyond their use for humans. Both recognise rivers as having spiritual, physical and metaphysical characteristics. These crucial extensions of law are based on ethical principles rarely recognised since the industrial age, but this is how indigenous peoples have long treated nature.
Permaculture and degrowth are both movements whose foundational ideas were developed the 70’s, just as the evidence was amassing in the science world to be able to explain the consequences of unchecked growth and human-induced environmental degradation. As such, both movements are reactionary and propose a radical, ethics-based paradigm shift away from the globally dominant culture of over-cons...
Vom 04.-08. Oktober 2017 organisieren die Zeitpioniere innerhalb der Vereinigung für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (VÖW) gemeinsam mit der Forschungsgruppe „Digitalisierung und sozial-ökologische Transformation" die VÖW-Herbstakademie „Digitalisierung im Grünen" auf der Insel Schwanenwerder bei Berlin. Chancen und Risiken der Digitalisierung für eine sozial-ökologische Gesellschaft Die z...
Nicht nur die Gewerkschaften, auch Ökonominnen und Ökonomen jenseits der Standardrepertoirevertretungen reden sich den Mund fusselig, dass man sich aus einer Krise nicht heraussparen kann. Selbst der IWF hat es ganz offiziell vorgerechnet: Die Kürzungspolitik, wie sie den schuldengeplagten Ländern in Europa aufgeherrscht wird, lässt die Wirtschaft weitaus stärker schrumpfen, als die Troika von IWF, [...]