→ Contribute with your ideas by answering this questionnaire ←
Over the past two decades, organisations such as the Support Group for International Degrowth Conferences, the International Degrowth Network (IDN), Degrowth.info and Research & Degrowth have each played a significant role in building the international degrowth movement. Through research, political engagement, communication, networking, grassroots experimentation, international conferences and cooperation, together with all of you, we have collectively contributed to making degrowth a credible and increasingly influential social, political and intellectual project.
Today, we believe it is both timely and necessary to come together.
The world is entering an era of profound instability. Escalating wars, accelerating climate disruption, biodiversity collapse, widening inequalities both between regions shaped by colonial and neo-colonial dynamics and within societies themselves, democratic backsliding, the rise of the far right, and the spread of increasingly dystopian techno-solutionist narratives all point towards a systemic collapse. Beyond ecological and economic dimensions, we are also facing deep cultural, anthropological and existential crises.
At the same time, degrowth has never been more relevant.
Public awareness is growing. Recent opinion polls suggest increasing support for many policies associated with a degrowth agenda. Our movement has developed a rich body of research, concrete policy proposals, democratic organisational practices, and numerous practical experiences in territories, municipalities, cooperatives, communities and institutions around the world.
The international dialogue has also deepened. Exchanges between the Global North and the Global South, and between Western, Central and Eastern European perspectives, are enriching degrowth while highlighting the importance of justice, reparations, debt, peace and plural pathways of transformation. Connections with municipalities, political parties, civil society organisations, trade unions, think tanks, practitioners and international institutions—including promising dialogues within the UN system—open new possibilities for collaboration and impact.
Yet despite this momentum, our collective resources remain extremely limited. Our organisations often work in parallel, sometimes duplicating efforts, while facing similar financial and organisational challenges. Strengthening cooperation, solidarity and strategic coordination could considerably increase our collective capacity without compromising the diversity, autonomy and strategic pluralism that are among the movement’s greatest strengths.
The mentioned organisations are therefore meeting for a retreat end of November 2026, conceived as a space for strategic reflection, mutual learning and collective imagination.
Rather than arriving with fixed answers, we invite everyone, through an open questionnaire, to contribute ideas, questions and proposals on how we can reinforce the international degrowth movement in the years ahead.
Possible themes include:
Our ambition is modest but important: to leave this gathering with stronger relationships, clearer priorities, practical commitments and renewed energy for advancing degrowth as a diverse, democratic and transformative international movement.
Support Group for International Degrowth Conferences, the International Degrowth Network (IDN), Degrowth.info and Research & Degrowth
Here we are again: a position in the degrowth movement becomes apparent, strong, almost dominant, and the other side responds, feeling misrepresented. And in reacting, it inevitably ends up claiming to be the herald of the “true Degrowth” and rejecting the contribution of the other side.
As a response to Jason Hickel's interview with the Break-Down Journal, the authors share their thoughts on degrowth as a concept and a movement, and the role it plays in a challenging political context.
What does degrowth mean in the Latin American context? In 2020, a series of six self-organized encounters attempted to dive into this question. Each meeting reflected the metaphor of the agricultural process: from sowing to harvesting. Among the conclusions was a unanimous desire to put into practice ‘other ways of inhabiting the world’, valuing the knowledge of the original peoples and inhabit...